mne platy CEO vubec nezajimaj, kdyz se medianovy zamestnanec bude mit podstatne lepe pro mne za mne at ma CEO nesmyslne vysoky plat ...
zakladni vady toho clanku na heritage:
1) je biased (dopredu stanoveno k cemu se musi dospet a k tomu se pouziji prislusne nastroje jako jine koeficienty atd.)
2) nezajima ho medianovy zamestnanec stejne jako tebe (co je podstatnejsi ?)
3) zamerne bere casovou radu uz od roku 74 aby "to nevypadalo tak hrozne", mnohem zajimavejsi by to bylo treba az od roku 2003, ty nuzky by byly mnohem otevrenejsi
4) prokazuje jen ze se produktivita a total compensation pohybuji stejnym smerem (korelace ?), priznava ze total kompenzace zaostavaji za rustem produktivity minimalne o 25% coz oduvodnuje "chybou mereni",
5) na oduvodneni zbyvajicich 75% rozdilu pouziva skrz nekolik vlastnich indikatoru ktere jini ani oficialni zdroje nepouzivaji proste "jinou metriku"a je diskutabilni ktera je pravdivejsi, mj. dle nich Paul Krugman se myli ...
nerovnost v bohatstvi v usa neni v case rovna, kdybys cetl poradne tento thread psal jsem o tom
******
opakovani matka moudrosti:
pres 15% Americanu nema zdravotni pojisteni
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_coverage_in_the_United_StatesOdpověďCitace
7
Software / Re:SW pro odhad počtu shromážděných lidí
« kdy: 02. 12. 2016, 11:30:58 »
Ivan Novy - jak vas tak ctu tak si cim dal vic vazim Listiny zakladnich prav a svobod kterou mame (doufam ze pravice je u nas na desitky let zdiskreditovana svymi minulymi ciny aby nemela ustavni vetsinu to zmenit)...asi malo ctete treba reddit.com jak zoufali americane vstupuji do zivota s nesplatitelnymi 150.000$ dluhy po skonceni VS, jak nemaji na zdravotni peci a na podporu ve stari si spori minimum z nich ... budou makat az do smrti
http://time.com/money/4258451/retirement-savings-survey/One-third of Americans report they have no retirement savings.
56% of Americans Have Less Than $10,000 Saved for Retirement
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/20/l-it-the-401k-is-a-failure.html536 lidi vlastni vice nez 20% svetoveho bohatstvi
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/inequality-against-democr_b_9133250.htmlAs a result of this surge, 16,000 Americans hold as much wealth as 80 percent of the nation’s population — some 256,000,000 people -and as much as 75 percent of the entire world’s population.
If the national minimum wage had kept pace with productivity, says Schmitt, it would have been $22 per hour by 2013.
Instead it’s $7.25 today.
A few billionaires are even wealthier. In the United States, 536 people had a shared net worth of $2.6 trillion at the end of 2015. These days even the top 0.01 percent isn’t immune from inequality.
“Between 1979 and 2012, after accounting for inflation, the productivity of the average American worker increased about 85 percent. Over the same period, the inflation-adjusted wage of the median worker rose only about 6 percent, and the value of the minimum wage fell 21 percent.
The median household income in the United States fell by more than 7 percent between 1999 and 2014. It’s now slightly over $53,000.
ad system smeruje k optimanimu rozdeleni zdroju - ja bych rekl ze system spis by mel smerovat k entropii, coz zrovna podle nize uvedeneho nevypada
http://www.businessinsider.com/share-of-us-household-wealth-by-income-level-2016-11obr. 1 (3 x za poslednich 100 let)
The top 0.1% of American households hold the same amount of wealth as the bottom 90%
obr. 2
The Gini coefficient is a measurement of the income distribution within a country that aims to show the gap between the rich and the poor. The number ranges from zero to one, with zero representing perfect equality (everyone has the same income) and one representing perfect inequality (one person earns the entire country's income and everyone else has nothing.) A higher Gini coefficient means greater inequality.
Zobrazit příspěvky
